Secant v. Cactus

Liste des Contributions

1. Basics of border apolarity

Weronika Buczynska (University of Warsaw)

09/05/2023 09:30

The aim of my talk is to introduce the border apolarity idea toegether with the tools necessary for its proof. I will recall the setting of border apolarity as it was done my joint paper with Jarek Buczynski. There we have formulated a version of apolarity lemma for a toric variety embedded via very ample line bundle and have proved it in the characteristic zero case. The main tool is to use...

2. Cactus rank and varieties

Jarek Buczynski (IMPAN Warsaw)

09/05/2023 11:00

The cactus variety of a projective variety X is a version of the secant variety, where we take into account the linear spans of all finite subschemes of bounded length, not only the smooth ones or smoothable ones. I will discuss the definitions and basic properties of cactus rank and cactus varieties, with a particular focus on why they are relevant as an obstruction to study secant varieties....

3. Ideal enumeration for border apolarity

Austin Conner (Harvard Universty)

09/05/2023 14:30

The first step in lower bounding the border rank of a tensor or polynomial
with border apolarity is to enumerate all ideals contained in the
annihilator with Hilbert series equal to the Hilbert series of an ideal of
general points. The second step requires determining whether any such ideal
may be deformed to an ideal of points. Typically, one simplifies these
questions by asking if there...

6. Counterexamples for the slice technique for cactus rank and border cactus rank

Filip Rupniewski (Universität Bern)

09/05/2023 16:00

The slice technique is a tool which let use to translate the question about rank (or border rank) of a tensor in to the analogue question about the subspace spanned by tensors of a smaller order. The technique works in the case of a rank and border rank, but not for cactus and border cactus rank. Gesmundo, Oneto and Ventura gave an example of a family of forms such that their simultaneous...

4. Algorithms for rank and cactus decomposition of polynomials 1

Daniel Taufer (KU Leuven)

10/05/2023 09:30

In this talk and the next one we will revise the algorithm for polynomial
decomposition originally proposed by Brachat-Comon-Mourrain-Tsidgaridas and
we will show how we can improve it. Then we will see how certain
modifications to the algorithm can lead to a cactus decomposition.

5. Algorithms for rank and cactus decomposition of polynomials 2

Alessandra Bernardi (Universita di Trento)

10/05/2023 11:00

7. Rank algorithms, Hilbert functions and non-saturated ideals

Fulvio Gesmundo (Saarland Universität)

10/05/2023 14:30

Some of the classical tensor decomposition algorithms are based on the ability of solving particular zero-dimensional polynomial system, defining the set of points of the decomposition. Generalized eigenvalue methods can be used for this task, and their complexity is controlled by the regularity of certain associated ideals, which are often non-saturated. We determine these regularity values...

8. Border rank bounds for $GL_n$-invariant tensors arising from spaces of matrices of constant rank

Derek Wu (Texas A&M University)

10/05/2023 16:00

One measure of the complexity of a tensor is its border rank.
Finding the border rank of a tensor, or even bounding it, is a difficult problem that is currently an area of active research, as several problems in theoretical computer science come down to determining the border ranks of certain tensors.
For a class of $GL(V)$-invariant tensors lying in a $GL(V)$-invariant space $V\otimes...

9. Border apolarity 2

Weronika Buczynska (University of Warsaw)

11/05/2023 09:30

10. Quot schemes and varieties of commuting matrices

Klemen Sivic (University of Ljubljana)

11/05/2023 11:00

Let $C_n(M_d)$ denote the affine variety of all $n$-tuples of commuting $d\times d$ matrices. The ADHM construction relates these varieties to Quot schemes, and in particular to Hilbert schemes. On the more applied side, varieties $C_n(M_d)$ are directly connected to the question whether a tensor has minimal border rank. Although $C_n(M_d)$ is usually reducible for $n>2$ and $d>3$, very few...

11. Open Problems

11/05/2023 14:30

12. On the minimal cactus rank

Macej Galazka (University of Warsaw)

11/05/2023 16:00

I will present the study of minimal cactus rank with respect to Veronese variety, Segre variety, and Segre-Veronese variety using an approach complementary to the one taken by Blaeser and Lysikov, and Jelisiejew, Pal, and Landsberg. I will analyze the case of 14th cactus variety in more detail.

13. Irreducibility of multigraded Hilbert schemes of points in general position in the product of projective spaces

Tomasz Mandziuk (University of Warsaw)

12/05/2023 09:30

I will present some necessary conditions for a point of a multigraded Hilbert scheme corresponding to r points in general position in a smooth projective complex toric variaty to be in the Slip component. These criteria can be used to classify irreducible multigraded Hilbert schemes corresponding to points in general position in the product of projective spaces.

14. Ranks of powers of quadrics

Cosimo Flavi (Universita di Firenze)

12/05/2023 11:00

Determining the rank of the powers of quadratic forms is a classical problem. Many examples of special decompositions appear in the literature. We analyze this problem from a modern point of view and we give an estimate of the value of the rank. Moreover, we determine its smoothable rank and its border rank.

16. Tensors of minimal border rank

J.M. Landsberg

12/05/2023 14:30

15. Cactus rank and varieties 2

Jarek Buczynski (IMPAN Warsaw)

12/05/2023 16:00